Alexey Arbatov

Alexey Arbatov is the head of the Center for International Security at the Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations.
Education

PhD, History, Moscow State Institute of International Relations
MA, Moscow State Institute of International Relations 

Latest Analysis

    • Carnegie.ru Commentary

    Peacekeepers Can Unlock Donbas Impasse

    • May 02, 2016

    The past two years have shown that in order to reliably end the fighting, an essential condition for the implementation of the Minsk agreements is a full-scale peacekeeping mission under the mandate of the UN Security Council with the use of military contingents of OSCE countries, equipped with armored vehicles, artillery, helicopters, and drones.

    • Article

    The Nuclear Deal With Iran: The Final Step or a New Stage?

    • April 20, 2016

    The Iranian nuclear deal may have created a useful precedent for Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty member states to strengthen the global nuclear nonproliferation system.

    • Op-Ed

    Russia Might Be the First Casualty if Nuclear Terrorism Becomes Reality

    • April 18, 2016

    If the nonproliferation regime is violated and terrorist organizations get access to nuclear technologies, it will be much easier for them to reach Russia through its neighboring borders than the United States across the Atlantic.

    • Carnegie.ru Commentary

    The First Strike Trap

    • November 16, 2015

    A first strike with nuclear weapons in a conflict between the great powers is bound to be catastrophic. At a time when speculation on nuclear weapons use has increased Russia and the United States should restate their commitment to the nuclear war prevention on which they had agreed in the Cold War era.

    • Carnegie.ru Commentary

    What Does Iran Get in Exchange for the Bomb?

    • July 20, 2015

    In assessing this compromise agreement, we should consider all the possible alternatives. There are three: a new Gulf War with airstrikes against Iran. The second option is a nuclear-armed Iran. The third possibility: a strike against Iran, followed by an Iran with nuclear weapons, and then followed by another regional war—only this time, a nuclear one

    • Paper

    An Unnoticed Crisis: The End of History for Nuclear Arms Control?

    • June 16, 2015

    Beginning with the signing of the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1963, an international arms control regime has limited existing nuclear arsenals and prevented further proliferation of nuclear weapons. But that entire system could soon unravel.

    • Op-Ed

    Protecting Nuclear Sanity

    • June 15, 2015

    Dialogue between Russia and the United States is needed to defuse tension and tone down irresponsible statements on both sides about nuclear weapons.

    • Article

    An Unnoticed Crisis: The End of History for Nuclear Arms Control?

    • March 16, 2015

    The nuclear arms control regime is unraveling. An aggressive search for new formats, concepts, and methods is urgently needed to adapt the system to changed realities.

    • Op-Ed

    Reckless: Don’t “Go for Broke” in Iran Nuclear Talks

    • March 09, 2015

    The risk of a failure to reach a comprehensive deal with Iran is growing. However, a gradualist approach is the most realistic option for solving the nuclear issue.

    • Op-Ed

    Imagining Russia, Iran, and the United States If the Nuclear Talks Fail

    • March 03, 2015

    If the nuclear talks fail, further Russian cooperation on coercing Iran is not likely while Russia and the West remain locked in a standoff over Ukraine. Moreover, Russia and Iran may move to build closer relations in the future.

Please note

You are leaving the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy's website and entering another Carnegie global site.

请注意...

你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。