Dmitri Trenin

Trenin, director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, has been with the center since its inception. He also chairs the research council and the Foreign and Security Policy Program.
Education

PhD, Institute of the USA and Canada, Russian Academy of Sciences

Latest Analysis

    • Carnegie.ru Commentary

    Game Over for Lukashenko: the Kremlin’s Next Move

    • August 17, 2020

    The Kremlin has had enough of Lukashenko, but it cannot allow Belarus to follow the path of Ukraine and become another anti-Russian, NATO-leaning bulwark on its borders.

    • Op-Ed

    China-Russia Relationship Model for Major Powers

    • July 15, 2020

    For the foreseeable future, Russian-Chinese relations are likely to be closer, and more productive than Russian-American ones. This is not based on emotions, but on national interests.

    • Carnegie.ru Commentary

    Podcast: Russian Foreign Policy in a Post-Pandemic World

    • July 10, 2020

    Alexander Gabuev is joined by Dmitri Trenin and Elena Chernenko to discuss what impact the global pandemic has had—and will continue to have—on Russian foreign policy.

    • Steady State: Russian Foreign Policy After Coronavirus

      • July 08, 2020

      The coronavirus pandemic has hastened the arrival of a new era of bipolarity. The short essays in this panoramic collection examine the various implications of the pandemic for Russia’s foreign relations.

      • Chapters

      Russia–U.S.: No Reset, Just Guardrails

      • July 08, 2020

      The longer-term consequences of the coronavirus will include the further intensification of U.S.-Chinese rivalry, and the emerging Sino-American bipolarity. Russia’s top priority should be to carefully maintain equilibrium—though not equidistance—between the United States and China.

      • Carnegie.ru Commentary

      How Russians are Reading Bolton and Trump

      • June 25, 2020

      John Bolton suggests that Putin can play Trump like a fiddle. The truth is that under the forty-fifth U.S. president, the bilateral relationship with Russia is now as bad as at any time since the early 1980s.

      • Carnegie.ru Commentary

      Decoding Russia’s Official Nuclear Deterrence Paper

      • June 05, 2020

      In a world where major powers are unconstrained by mutual obligations regarding their most powerful arms, proper communication is key to avoid fateful mistakes.

      • Carnegie.ru Commentary

      U.S. Withdrawal From Open Skies Bolsters Case for New Strategic Regime

      • May 22, 2020

      The 50-year-old arms control regime that helped keep the Cold War cold is beyond repair. It's time to begin discussing ways of moving toward a new global strategic regime.

      • Carnegie.ru Commentary

      How Russia Can Maintain Equilibrium in the Post-Pandemic Bipolar World

      • May 01, 2020

      To avoid becoming part of a Sino-centric power bloc and maintain international equilibrium, which is critically important to Russia’s status and self-image, Moscow must reduce its dependence on China by fostering its relations with other large economic and financial players: primarily European countries, India, and Japan.

      • Carnegie.ru Commentary

      Russia–U.S.: No Reset, Just Guardrails

      • April 29, 2020

      The longer-term consequences of the coronavirus will include the further intensification of U.S.-Chinese rivalry, and the emerging Sino-American bipolarity. Russia’s top priority should be to carefully maintain equilibrium—though not equidistance—between the United States and China.

    Please note

    You are leaving the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy's website and entering another Carnegie global site.

    请注意...

    你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。